Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ranulf de Glanvill's avatar

Just to refresh my memory (and perhaps for the benefit of those following at home).... Am I correct in believing that the PI hearing in this case is unlikely to have live testimony? The April 27 proceeding would be more like oral argument rather than a "hearing" in which the Vice Chancellor is taking testimony -- right?

(And for what it's worth, you get a huge amount of points in my book for setting us plebeians straight on the intricacies of motion practice in Chancery.)

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts